3700x vs 3900x gaming reddit. The extra four cores ain't ganna do much.

3700x vs 3900x gaming reddit. You have an Index so you should get the better gaming CPU.
The performance from say 3700X to 3900X is at least 4x more performance than the 3700X to 3800X. Either way I think the 3600 is the best choice atm purely because amd discounts their hardware when future generations come out meaning a 3700x will be cheap a few years from now. The extra four cores ain't ganna do much. Developed for the PS5/XBSX by fictionally incompetent programmers who presumably base everything around some kind of nonsense static constexpr size_t THREADS_MIN = 16; constant that would never exist in any If the 3600 becomes too weak for gaming in 2023 because it doesn't have enough cores, you pick up a second hand 3700x (or even a 3950x by that point) and drop it in. 7ghz on my old 4790k; couldn't beat 4. The question is, do I need the 3900X or could I save a boatload and drop to the 3700X or even 3600? I primarily play Path of Exile, which is very happy to chug along with my current set up (I average between 60-100FPS depending on what's going on, with settings low. 6M subscribers in the Amd community. The results should look similar to the 3900x vs 10700k benchmarks. 0 gpu and a single nvme ssd like most people its a lot harder to justify the expense. I quote: In other words, the average 3800X should overclock better than the best 3700X processors, but it's still a minor 6% frequency difference we’re talking about between the absolute worst 3700X and the absolute best 3800X per their testing. 6/4. But I'm already happy if the FPS is above 70 or 80). And to be honest, games that currently bottleneck a Zen 2 at 30-50 FPS ( example New World in the middle of a 50 vs 50 war ). After the release I see that Intel's still dominate gaming scenario for quite a LOT. Also super stoked for a 3900x. (because of bad optimization), which gets even worse when I stream (sometimes reaches below 50 FPS). The price argument falls flat for me because of DCS World. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. Making it here and apologies for that! Hi Guys. In games as they dont load up all the threads that heavily, the difference will be somewhat smaller. The only review they have is 3700x not 3900x, but ill watch it, I been looking for good 3900x+2080ti benchmark but NO ONE has them, i googled and did YT serach, i can find some but cant find any 9900K+2080ti vs 3900x+2080ti in 4K, if you know of any, drop me a link. If you want a great gaming experience, the 3800x (and more importantly the 3700x, but as I don't have it I cannot strictly give a first hand account of it) is just wonderful. I do agree that the 3700x is enough for most people. It's not about the hardware in your rig, but the software in your heart! Join us in celebrating and promoting tech, knowledge, and the best gaming, study, and work platform there exists. The other possible advantage is if the 3900x is only using the primary thread on each core - when SMT is in use it enhances throughput but reduces the single threaded performance on its core, but the 3900x may have enough threads that the secondary logical threads are "silent" in games, effectively letting the cpu run as a 12c/<24t processor in I wonder if the 3700X and 3800X will eventually be better for gaming than the 3900X, since those have all their cores on a single chiplet. If video editing is your job then 3900x but if your like the rest of us then 3700x is plenty. It's not even close - the extra cores on the 3900X make no difference, but the improved architecture on the 5600X does. The 5600X has fewer cores than the 3700X, but since it's a newer-generation part, it has higher single-core performance. Seems like there’s some fall off vs the 8 core 3700x already, and that’s only likely to increase as games are developed for PS5/XBSX. Even if the GPU is somewhat of a bottleneck, I think that in the long run it's worth waiting a little, and potentially spending a little more, to make sure the CPU is less of a bottleneck in the long run. 3900x @ 4. 25ghz all-core on Ryzen 3700X, 4. Yeah, I think I'm going to. 3700x seems to be the golden chip which is why it is just as out of stock as the 3900x have been. Zero difference if OBS is on or off. The 3600 is sufficient, the 3700X futureproof and the 3900X a waste of money, if it's only used for gaming. Will probably still have a shitty FPS with a future gen CPU. Zen3, Zen3 just has much faster cores. If your work can take advantage of more CPU cores, the 3900X will absolutely trounce the 3700X. but I'm going to test it soon when I upgrade my 1700x dedi rig to a 3700x later this year. There should not be any IPC difference between the models, otherwise something would be extremely fucky :D afaik the 3700x is one 8 core die while the 3900x is two six core dies. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen3, RDNA3, EPYC… Between a 9900k and a 3700x, it's an each choice if we don't care about price, on paper AMD cpus outperform Intel CPUs on the same frequency, because of the IPC increases, so on paper 4. Strictly gaming, 3800X or the new 3800XT, games loves high frequency and doesn't need 12-cores. Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen 9 3900X . I'm not entirely sure what benefit I get from having 8 cores and more threads rather than the 5600x when all I really do is gaming. A 3700X would be better value for a gaming PC but then I would still recommend a 5600X over a 3700X, making the 3000 series irrelevant unless you get the 3600 for budget oriented builds or just want a better GPU for higher resolution gaming. Is the 3900x overkill for what I want to do? If not I am fine spending the money on the 3900x. Discover discussions, news, reviews, and advice on finding the perfect gaming laptop. The 3900X makes sense if you do actual work that benefits from the extra threads. With the new consoles coming out having 8 core processors I predict we will see many games shifting towards favoring multi core and heavily multi threaded compute in which case the 3900x would be more future proof. 0) or more pcie slots x570 would be a better choice, otherwise if you have a single pcie 3. streaming. luckily if I disable 2 of the 12 cores it runs perfectly fine lol. You definitely do not need all the cores and threads of the 3900X, if you want to go AMD the 3700X is a better value. You will probably get more multicore performance from the 3800X but nothing compared to the 3900X. The 3700X vs 3900X is a comparison of CPUs with 65W TDP and 105W TDP, so a TDP difference during full load will of course be close to the TDP difference. The 3800X is just a higher clocked 3700X that you also get one more free game with. The 5800X3D really is the AM4 king of gaming. The faster IPC also makes the 5600x an even match in productive workloads, while the 5600x is plain superior in gaming by quite a margin. Yes, I'm aware the next-gen consoles are 8c/16t. In fact, the 3900X is no better than the 3700X for games. Most people buying it for gaming. Join our passionate community to stay informed and connected with the latest trends and technologies in the gaming laptop world. The 5600X is the faster gaming CPU, and it will very likely remain that way indefinitely. Value for money 3900X then the 3700X. So I am building my first pc and would like a little help. The 3600X is a 6-core CPU and the 3700X is an 8-core CPU, so maybe there could be a difference there in some years if games start to need 16 threads. I know the new architecture is better suited for gaming (due to the whole cache being available to every core) and that they increased the instructions per cycle. Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. Based on benchmarks posted online the 5600x beats it in terms of performance for gaming but the 3700x has 2 more cores and 4 more threads so it probably depends on if you're doing anything that's more CPU intensive. The $129 USD (165%) price premium between a 3600 and 3700x in 2019 will be enough to cover the entire cost or more in 2023, plus you can sell the old 3600 as well. same with BDO huge gains See full list on techspot. Almost same price as the 3700x, while it's going to be like up to 25% slower in productivity in some instances, while being ahead in gaming. The difference in performance between the two is negligible to none, especially if you apply a light OC to the 3700X. Go 3700x for $100. Your thoughts on that?I also have 64 gb of ram and 2gb nvme ssd with 3700X @ 4. And it works great so far. Otherwise, if you are sticking to gaming only, the 3700x is totally fine. If you want to do anything CPU intense besides gaming (Or do something while gaming like streaming etc) You should likely find advantages in using the 3900x. I saw how much faster (a good 60-100%) the 3900X is at compiling, UE4 development and other multi-core tasks, while only being marginally slower at gaming (well, only as long as new games don't make proper use of multiple cores, the 12-core 3900X might even be better for gaming than the 5600X in the long run, who knows really) Even with a brand 3700X: 3. At the moment the 9700k might be the best gaming choice but in the long run I would say the 3700x is the better choice. Between the 3700X and the 5700G, the performance should be similar. A high-clocked Intel 6c/12t part will easily keep up with 8 Zen 2 cores at sub-4 Ghz. If you bought the 3700X to do overclocking, you're going to be disappointed. The 3700x is powerful enough for almost every game in 1080p and then you’re usually gpu bottlenecked in 4k. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). GamersNexus did a deep dive on PBO for Ryzen 3000 and found it to be pretty much worthless due to binning of Ryzen being very tight to spec. 3Ghz/1. The 3900X is not better for gaming. I wouldn't get it just for gaming though. (Unless you get a great deal on the Ryzen 9) I went for the 3900x cause I want to stream and record in the back without influencing my game. Sure it might be enough now (even though there already is a difference in quite a few games, especially when you have background stuff open), but especially now the consoles finally got decent cpu's (8 core ryzen cpu's comparable to the 3700x). 3700X vs 3900X I am attempting to put a shopping list together to build a workstation for stock trading and basic internet browsing. They havent done any weirdness with the setup. 3600 is fine but others are clearly lacking and inconsistent. The 3900X demands a premium because the majority of X370 and B350 motherboards can't use Zen 3 CPUs. A 3700x is no slouch and would offer great performance for the use case you stated. 5800X3D seems perfect. Amd ryzen 7 3800xt vs 7 3700x vs 5 5600x Which one of these processors would be best for gaming also for school and uses in photo and video editing. It can be buggy in games. Here is some good stats on power consumption between the 3700X and 3900X. I dont know the IO situation w/ Intel, but a 32GB/s gpu link, a true pcie 4 nvme, and 2x nvme off the chipset, along w/ 50GB/s 64GB of affordable ram w/ a path to 128GB, sure sounds a Dec 31, 2020 · The extra cores deliver big gains in heavily threaded applications, and the improved architecture offers great gaming performance, too, making for an incredibly well-rounded processor. Cores in one CCX can only access the L3 cache of that CCX. if you're cpu-bound you'll definitely notice improvements, lets say you have a 4080 gpu, and you play at 1080p-1440p, most of the games will probably cpu-bound at that resolution so you'll notice a difference from a 3700x to 5700x. 2ghz 3800 Cl14 RAM 3900X @ 4. The 3900x actually has a worse cache setup unless the cache access is small and relatively uniform coming from most of the cores. So then my 3700x is plenty for basically every game in 1080p@120Hz. Currently still have a 3700x and wonder if should go for a cheap 3900x or the brand new 5900x Would the 5900x be alot better when gaming and streaming from 1 PC? Archived post. g. I would go with a 3600 and a B450 board. I have a carbon pro motherboard, and rtx 3060ti gpu. The 3900x when I checked on UserBenchmark only performs about 4% faster on average than the 3700x. 0 or 4. So I notice some users will saying after they have swapped from a 3900X to 5900X and the games is much more fluent than before. But, 4K usually places much more emphasis on the GPU than the CPU, so upgrading from a 3700X will likely net you a very small gain, or nothing, currently. 3900x is close enough in gaming to 9900K and dominant enough in everything else to make it the better buy otherwise, IMHO. The 3700X does have a lot better workload performance but for a strictly gaming rig I don’t feel it’s worth the extra 130$. Even vs last gen like i stated above its 70 bucks more and competes with the zen 3 range, its a no brainer to go 10700k over 3700x or 9900K for purely gaming. The 5600X can beat the 3700X on gaming and productivity, for the same price, even with less cores. Ryzen 7 3700x would be fine and cheaper. Is the Wraith stock cooler able to handle 3900X temperatures at moderate load (gaming + middly-demanding background tasks like streaming, YouTube videos, Chrome tabs, Discord chats, or some combination of those)? Good! Not saying that you need a 3900X, I managed to stream well on a 3700X but that was with very basic setup that wasn’t very taxing on the system when checking the CPU load in OBS/HWiNFO so can’t really compare the “basic” setup with the 3700X and the “advanced” with the 3900X. The extra threads on the 3900X are not going to magically start helping in the next few years for gaming. I have a 2080 and mainly use my pc for gaming while watching twitch. Should I get a Ryzen 3900X or a Ryzen 7 5800X for gaming (VR Mostly)? For anybody wondering I am using a Valve Index for vr and a 1440p 144hz display at my desk. Example: "5800x3D over a 3700x at 100 FPS at minimum, worth it?" (My target FPS is around 140 for most games. I was able to get 4. Thanks for explaining why the 3900X seemed to outperform the 3700X. I've looked over several reviews and it seems like the Ryzen 7 3700x will do what I'm looking for, but is the jump from a 3700x to a 3900x worth it? View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. example would be dota 2 , used to hover around 80 min and 200fps+ max on modified settings with 11400f and 3700x now i get 300 min and 500+ fps max with everything maxed out on 1080p. 3700x. That being said you also plan to stream, so in that case the 3700x is a no-brainer. Dec 26, 2019 · In Cinebench R20's multi-core score the 3900X and 3700X provided roughly the same performance, making them around 14% faster than the 9900K when matched clock-for-clock. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Did you even look at reviews of the 3900X and 3700X? Gaming. Does it compete with having a dual pc stream? probably not, still might be that input lag. Streaming and editing. 3900x performs in games pretty much exactly like my 3600x and it nets around 180-200fps on cpu bound games for me (i play a lot of dota 2). But I dont know if it is the same with 3700x. You have an Index so you should get the better gaming CPU. got a 3060ti and i saw great gains (especially from esport titles and old games ) from 11400F which is comparable to a 3700x in terms of performance. Imo, the people that really benefit from a 5600x over a 3700x are people that want to play at high refresh 1440p. The 3700x should close this gap Average FPS 2700x vs i9 9900K. 3125V all cores Dark Rock Pro 4 32 GB DDR4 3600Mhz CL16 RTX 4090 Alienware aw3423dw (21:9 1440p) My usage: Gaming @ 1440p ultrawide, ideally with a target of 100-140 fps Programming AI Leaning Standard Linux/Windows stuff View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. My then about 150$ X370 motherboard is still running like a champ, but now with a Ryzen 9 3900X, using my ryzen 7 in a server with a cheap B450 motherboard. If I feel like upgrading at some point I'll get a 5800x3d and put my 3900X in my server. The TDP of both processors, 65w and 105w respectively is a bit off from the actual full load power consumption which is 75w for the 3700X and 125w for the 3900X. 3900X: we don't know the gaming performance of this. Jul 16, 2020 · When looking to build a new AMD-powered PC, should you choose the Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 9 3900X? We've put together a short guide to walk you through the differences and which CPU is From the looks of it, the bin quality of 3700x seems the same if not better. That's not going to end up influencing PC gaming that much, at least not at the start of the generation. Across the board 2000MHz IF with good samples hitting higher would change current sentiment quick) Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). true. If they're the same price, I'd go with the 5700G for the backup graphics option. 3700x has a 4+4 CCX config while 3900x is 3+3+3+3. Namely, being in stock. Get a 3700x and a better cooler if you got the cash The main use for this computer is to play and stream video games. I was talking about the 3600X, not the 3700X. 3ghz 3800 CL14 RAM 2700X @ 4. Minimum FPS. Amazing. Generally the 3600, 9700k or 3900X are better CPU choices. -3% contrary to 1080p -19% - according to Guru3D; and Shadow of Tomb Raider -8% at 1080p and +3% at 1440p). Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. There's almost no difference whatsoever in games. 50% gaming and 50% school and work. The 3600X narrows that gap slightly more. The 3600 is sufficient for a gaming PC. It's only very recently that AMD stopped blocking motherboard makers from enabling newer CPUs with the X370/B350 chipsets. Also, seems like the differential is much closer at 1440p gaming (For example Deus Ex Mankind Divided only 3 FPS lower for 3900X, ie. 3700x vs 3800x vs 3900x, worth the price difference for my use? I'm looking to upgrade from an old 4790k and wanted to go with one of these cpus but im not sure which. Depending on the GPUand your settings there might not even be an FPS difference in the first place. I've had the 5800X3D since it was released, absolute beast mode of a CPU, it's classed as "Old" now due to the later gen X3D CPUs out but don't be fooled, the 5800X3D still punches above its weight especially for gaming, I've got mine coupled with a 3090ti and a 240Hz 1080p monitor, insane high FPS in every title, max settings everything. 3800X: better but has a little price premium. I plan on gaming and streaming from the pc and I would also like to do video editing and photoshop as well. Maybe a few select titles that really enjoy threads will push it on top, but for general gaming we have no indication the 3700x would be faster any time soon. (Side note: The 5600 G and 5700 G are outliers to this logic in the sense that they are actually quite a lot slower than the the 5600 X and 5800 X respectively. I have an ASRock X570 Pro4 coming in the mail, so any help deciding on the CPU would be so appreciated! This was the last unanswered question regarding 3700X vs 3900X. CPU limitations in DCS World: gone. So the 5800X has the same price as the 3900X. x570 pcie 4. However look at the 3700x its meeting or beating both of those cpus in games. 4ghz single core. As the title says, is it worth upgrading from a 3700X to a 5800X3D in 2022? I'm having some FPS issues in certain CPU bounded games like Escape from Tarkov, Warzone etc. com For gaming AND streaming or video/photo editing, $100 is cheap compared to the multi core advantage you get with the 3700x. The 3700x isn’t really ideal to manually overclock the old way and uses algorithms to dynamically get the best clock it can. Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter Yup exactly, that's the problem of all these tests. TL;DR just read the bullet points. 3700X is binned with slightly worse silicon. These will be the last AM4 CPU family, and should be considerably faster for gaming than the 5000 family. Only a small handful of them have actually had BIOS/U The 3900X will be the best choice, having the best single core and multicore performance. The 1080p bench results of Guru3D are within margin of few percent because of different build. If you upgrade now and keep your gpu for a while, you probably wont see a massive increase as i’d assume you’re still going to be fairly gpu bottlenecked (depending on the game of course) but you would definitely see an increase in fps. If tho, ur a candidate to get a matching amd rx 6800xt gpu & x570 mobo, then there are synergies which can add a further 10% to gaming perf, & i suspect there ismuch fine wine in "SAM" e. I have a 3900X and 3060Ti. Because of this, game engines are likely always going to be limited by one or two logic threads, so the slowest core in the system is always going to end up being the performance limiter. The article says the opposite. Ryzen 5 3600 vs 3700X for Monero (RandomX) mining They both have 32MB, suggesting they could use 16 threads for 2MB scratchpad mining, suggesting same hashrate, meaning 3600 with its much lower price would be the obvious choice +- few H/s from the CPU frequency. The 3600 is for all types of gaming and pretty much all general desktop use. 113fps vs 144fps average, minimums are even worse and this is a new title. It has 2 chiplet and more cores than usual. The Personal Computer. They're close in games and the 3700x sometimes gets better 1% lows but the 3900x generally pulls ahead a tiny bit. Then Zen 3 happened. The 5800X3D either matches or beats the 5900X in gaming. 3900x is better bang for the buck, but won't have quite as high gaming performance is all. The tldr seems to be, for FFXIV short of a heavy oc on a 9900k, the Ryzen 3700x seems a great choice. The 2700x does not offer the performance of current Intel chips in gaming. Also keep in mind good quality 3200/3600MHz RAM will make it far easier for you to migrate to a future CPU & mobo upgrade. 10900k vs 10700k vs, or 3900x vs 3700x vs 3600 vs a reference blower) then for gaming, its From what I’m seeing on userbenchmark there’s really only around 5% difference in gaming performance from 3600 to 3700X. The 3700X is the same as a 3600 for gaming (and photoshop), slower than the 9700k and the 3900X is *WAY* faster for the things the 3700X beats the 3600 at. Moreover, they were 18% No idea mate, never used the 3700x. And in the case of Zen2 vs. I think 3600X better and easier on the vrm/heat department so xfr will work good. I came here to literally ask why that was. For productivity, you're only going to get super big gains if you jump to a 3900x or a 5900x. 9900k vs 3700x It's not bottlenecking, and even 9600k is faster than the 3700x in gaming. I'd go with the 3700X unless you find a really good deal on the 3800X that puts it within 10-20 dollars of the 3700X. The only ones worth considering are 3600, 3700x and 3900x. The 3900X would be better compared to 3800X - both are the same TDP. So a lot of people are saying the ryzen 7 3700x is a great CPU for gaming and multitasking. The 5800X is an 8-core processor, 3900X 12-core. It's about $300 USD but I looked at the ryzen 9 3900x and it's nearly double the threads and a good amount more cores than the 3700x with a higher clock speed. The 3900X has a bigger cache than the 5800X. I still don't know if l should get the Ryzen 9 3900X as it is only 399€ right now or the ryzen 5 which would most likely bottleneck my 3080, which would only leave the ryzen 7 5800X. 3ghz 3666 CL14 RAm 9900K @ 5ghz 4. Hi, Is an 3900x performs worse for gaming in my use case 1. Is the CCD-CCD latency at all significant or is it a non factor with the 3900X? I can't find any articles that talk about it. SKILL DDR4 TridentZ RGB for 600 CAD or 5900x MSI MPG B550 Gaming Carbon WIFI 32GB DDR4 XPG D10 3200MHZ for 680 CAD Edit: Mainly for games like Siege, CSGO, maybe COD, a few racing games and stuff like that it would make a difference, but for anything else, at 4K, there's not much of a reason to do it, unless you are heavily CPU limited in some game, which i don't think it's that possible, check the GPU utilization for the games you play, if there's anything bellow 90%+ utilization, and if a CPU overclock + RAM Honestly, as Gamers' Nexus said in their review, the 3700X is in a weird place and generally shouldn't be purchased by most people. That said, possibly consider the 5900X or the 5800X if you need fast single thread performance. 9 on the intel one, somewhere along those lines. Mainly gaming now. A 3800XT wouldn't fare all that much better than a 3700X so it depends on what you're using. It ends up being quite a lot faster than the 3700X for games. but if you play at higher resolution like 4k or have a weaker gpu that will make you gpu bound even at 1080p then you wont notice any difference at all. Jul 7, 2019 · The internet has been ripe with rumors and chatter about AMD’s new 7 nm CPUs and today we have the Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core/24-thread and the Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core/16-thread CPUs for testing and we’ll see what these things really can or can not do. . Not really man. Anything will run circles around your 6006u, that is a seriously weak CPU by today's standards. I don't see how he thinks the 10600k is positioned any better than the 10700k. , which could have similar effect in other apps. 3700x vs 3900x . 5ghz of a 3700x should be around 5. If you were strictly gaming, 3600 all day, no questions asked. Well worth it. Jumping from the 1700X with 2133MHz RAM to a 3700X with 3200MHz or 3600MHz RAM will have a far greater impact on your gaming than the performance difference between the 3700X and 3900X. 3700x vs 5600x So I got a 3700x over the holidays for $250 and was thinking about returning it and getting a 5600x because I mostly just game and use FL studio. This is from a Japanese site talking about the 3900x and 3700x vs the 9900k and 2920 TR. Valheim Genshin View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 7ghz Uncore 4533 CL17 RAM the overall results are as follows 3900X 182 FPS Average 9900K 204 FPS Average 3700X 176 FPS Average 2700X 151 FPS Average 2700X = 100% Baseline 3700X = 116% Baseline Performance For gaming, Then 8 core ccx vs the 4 core ccx on the zen 2 won't make much of a difference now, but as textures increase in size and games use more cores the latency between the ccxs on the zen 2 will start to widen the gap between them within 2 or 3 years. I am looking at a 5800X3D or 5900X but not anytime soon tbh. 3700x ASUS CROSSHAIR VI HERO KINGSTON 32GB ECC DDR4 PSU (I will reuse my current one) CASE (I will reuse my current one) for 450 CAD or 3900x Asus ROG Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi) 64gb G. In gaming right now though the difference between a 3600 and a 3700x at 1440p is extremely minimal. So between the two, I'd go with whichever is cheaper. For Phoronix readers, I suspect doable gaming is just a nice to have - a perk for valued staff to game at work vs home after hours, & beat the commute rush. I originally wanted a 3700x, but its more expensive brother does have one very big advantage over both the 3700x and the 3900x. I have both the 3900X and the 3700X, the 3700X won't go as high single core even with manual OC, that's why I recommend 3800X/XT for gaming as they go as high/higher than 3900X. 0 chipset makes for way more flexibility for its expansion ports so if you need multiple 4x nvme (even "just" pcie 3. If you’re gaming, then 3600, if under heavy workloads, 3700x or 3900x We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I'd just go with 5600x and i imagine you will be encoding with NVENC so you don't really need 12 cores. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Given how the 3900x is barely beating the 3700x in real-life gaming, it seems like the extra £60-70 on the 3800x won't be worth it when the 3900x is even more expensive and performs basically the same. If you are on the edge wait to see if Intel price drops and then if you are just gaming it might be a slightly better deal for the 9900k. so, saying this, is there any good reason to go Ryzen for gaming/streaming instead of going for Intel The 6700k was being utilized up to 100% at in its prime, so buying a 4c for mid-high end gaming after that was just stupid. Your upcoming hyped up favourite game may run bad because you choose ryzen without listening your reason. im looking to upgrade my pc, and im wondering if i should go for a ryzen 7 Im going to stay with this platform for a very long time, initially my plan was to get 3950x but upon initial zen 2 launch they only launched 3900x and later 3950x so i settled for 3700x with the idea of upgrading it for last gen am4 cpu and it was totally worth it. From what I can see their methodology seems consistent. Otherwise, 9600K seems to be the deal for pure gaming. Save it and buy new RAM with that money instead. if i were you, either wait for am5 to receive their x3d chips, or go ahead and get the 5800x3d if you plan on keeping your motherboard. That's why for some time, the 3600 and 3700X were still recommended as value kings, for gaming and streaming respectively. Both are powerful enough for your needs. I myself have a 3700x on a x470 platform and I'm happy with that, but I would definitely not buy it right now. (pre-benchmarks comment, subject to change. I mostly play PUBG so it's rather intensive on the CPU, but I won't really ever use all 12 cores (I think?). Some questions before I pull the trigger on a build in a few weeks. Afaik it (3900x) has 2 chiplets with 2x 3CCX i think. I used to do a lot of video editing but not so much anymore. Oh I see, sorry, just forget my first comment. Zen 2 was still great value with great multi-core performance and decent enough single-core perf. I know that because 5000 series CPU single core performance has outwitted it’s predecessor because of it’s L3 Data size 2x32mb vs 4x16mb. 4 and it has higher tdp. The 3700X is around 5% faster at 720p, according the benchmarks of PCGH, a German magazine. In this case the relatively small performance gap between the 3700x vs 5800x can actually make a difference if you want to maintain high refresh rates 3700x - $294. Comparing 4 Generations of Ryzen 7 CPUs! 7700X vs 5700X vs 3700X vs The 5800X3D is AMD's best CPU for gaming, so don't consider the 5900X. Get the 5600X (or the 3700X All Ryzen 3000 are very close when it comes to gaming performance. I'm using AMD 3900x with Kraken x62 and see the following with precision boost overdrive enabled and windows power settings set to max performance: Idle Temps: 42 -46c Gaming Temps: 64 - 66c Ambient Room Temp: 21c I'm using Cooler Master Maker thermal paste The same as Intel CPUs. The 5600X isn't better because it was released yesterday; it's better because it's built better. My 3900X is slightly damaged though from a mishap with some "less than essential" pins. That said, that is the max power draw in a full load which is not the case while gaming. If the b450 platform will support a 4700x then that's another option. Or keep buying 3000s, if my 3700X gives out, a 3900X looks like the correct upgrade, +50% from cores looks better than ~+25% from improvements. It would be great but there is no point of having 12 cores for gaming. The 3900X is slightly faster than the 3700X (~5%). 4 3600X: 3. I'd honestly just ignore an upgrade for productivity, the 2700 is pretty killer even if it's not quite up there these days. ) The amd part keeps up in multithreaded task and is a little slower in gaming and some light threaded task. Index can push high refresh rates of 120hz/144hz. 8/4. There own slide showed it isnt much better than the 10700k and the 10700k is cheaper than Zen 3, and will have another gen of CPU support vs AM4 being dead after Zen 3. You don't necessarily need a PC to be a member of the PCMR. The only reason not to go for it is if you either already are on a 5000 series CPU or you need the extra cores for any other non-gaming workload. Imo if you want the best gaming CPU but that still high end get the 3700x the value is insane. the 3700x and especially the 3900x should be able to handle a single pc x264 stream now with all the optimizations that have been put in place. Also, there's not a big difference between the 3600 and the 3600X performance wise, though the cooler on the 3600X is better. i would love to see a benchmark where they pair an 10600k vs 3600/3700x with mid range gpu like 2060/2070 super or 5700XT, also on mid tier hardware like sub $200 mobo, an under $50 air cooler or just stock cooler (nvm the i5 doesn't come with a cooler!) since that's what most people buying these mid tier cpu gonna pairing with. Just read in a german PC magazine that they only recommend 3900x for gamers who have background tasks e. The 3700X is better in its own ways vs the 3600 and definitely a better purchase than the 3600X with a much better included cooler, 33% faster performance in multi-thread, better future-proofing, and there are a few games where it's notably faster at high refresh. Test showed 3-10% better performance between 3700x and 3900x so 10% is not worth the couple hundred dollars more that I could throw at the gpu and help my gaming and streaming. I plan to get 32 Gigs of ram, an SSD, and a decent graphics card (nongaming). They both have around the same frequencies. However, if you have either a B550 or X570 motherboard, an AMD 5000-series CPU and one of the new Big Navi GPUs (6800, 6800XT or 6900XT) you can get some performance boost because of something called Smart Access Memory. The 9700k will always provide better framerate over 3700x i think. Rumor is it's even faster single core by quite a bit. My friend's B350 motherboard is rocking a 5800x3d. 41 votes, 40 comments. 3600 overclocked gives "basically" the exact same game framerates (including "1% low FPS") as the 3700x, 3800x and 3900x (also all overclocked). If you plan to upgrade in 2 or years, I'd get the 3900x I went with 3700x instead of 3900x I am also a gamer with a gtx 1080. It's as simple as looking at benchmarks. In terms of gaming experience, 3600 is like the sweetspot, anything above is a slight bump in game-performance; we shouldnt forget that you want to stream, so depending on your games either 3700x/3800x or if you want some headroom, go with the 3900x. Agree with all your points though, only reason to go with a 9900K for gaming is if money is no object and you only game. Though note the Ryzens are running faster RAM. Also in most games the 3700x spanked the 9900k and the 3900x did too. 14 3900x - $409. Yeah Zen 3 aint exactly a hot choice atm. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. So after 5 years since I bought an i5-4690k (thanks to Reddit's help) I wanted to wait and try Ryzen CPUs. I play in 1440p with a decent build (RTX 3070, Ryzen 7 3700X, 16GB 3200Mhz I just went to a 5800X over a 3700X and the difference is actually staggering. Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter I did post it before in a wrong Reddit section. The reason u wanna go 3700x is because then the 4700x comes out sell Ur 3700 and get 4700x. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 99 Would it be worth spending the roughly $100 to get 12 cores vs 8 cores? For reference I do a lot of gaming, some streaming, and a little bit of video editing for YouTube. Look at Farcry 5. Now I see why AMD was proclaiming 3900X as "The World's First 12-core Gaming Processor" More like a few hours for certain encodes like 4K 60fps videos from my camera (x265 is a harsh mistress), so every bit helps. Hell, even the 9700K would be enough. You just have to love PCs. For me the 9700k + motherboard was cheaper than the 3700X + motherboard - however if I didn't care about features, I could obviously save $100+ buy buying a cheaper B450 board (but there are none that suited me, also no X470 boards available, otherwise I might have just taken the gaming performance hit and bought the 3900X). Plus 2-3-4 years from now who knows what the games will be able to utilize. But if the 3700x can handle it just fine I wouldn’t mind saving some money! It's exactly because this benchmark testing that I've revised my opinion on the actual value of the 3900X, because I told myself exactly that "the 3900X is a bargain for only 100$ more I get 4 more cores, double the cache and same TDP", solely because I only knew about the 3800X what AMD had written on their lineup table, and not that the 3800X Guys just a question ))) I want to stream in 1440p and game at same time on single PC and dont know which CPU to choose from AMD 9 3900x vs & 5800x or expensive 9 5900x plus at moment i have AMD 5 3600x CPU and Radeon RX5700XT GPU and I am thinking off changing it for RTX 3070 or 3080 so i can use Nvenc encoder ffor streaming. sau bfch swjv mxcj mzvt uvoqhm mchhcq urwrffd kjqru wbpcog